From: Autonomous vehicles are cost-effective when used as taxis
Assumption | Justification |
---|---|
Driverless autonomous vehicles (AVs) will have a higher minor crash rate than human piloted vehicles | Minor crash rates of human-piloted vehicles are very difficult to estimate as most go unreported. Simulations from Waymo show lower crash rates, but the company has a financial stake in such outcomes. Reported minor crash rates for Waymo showed higher rates in AVs as compared to HPVs. The Waymo dataset is a key data source for this study. |
2 million miles of driving is adequate for inference regarding the safety of AVs | We used established formulas to extrapolate probabilities of injury and death using observed mean crash speeds for AVs. |
If adopted today, AVs would eliminate most parking spaces | AVs can be rented as taxis by private car owners when not being used. |
The cost of autonomous vehicles will decline following Moore’s law | The efficiency and cost of many technologies follows Moore’s law for central processing unit speeds. |
Used cars will have a similar market, whether human piloted or autonomous | While technologies in AV have few moving parts, they tend to decline in value as fast as automobiles do because the technology becomes dated very quickly. |
Autonomous vehicles without a human driver will increase productivity | When the driver’s seat can hold a paying passenger, the additional passenger will sometimes perform work on a device (e.g., emailing colleagues). |
AVs and human-piloted vehicles are of similar quality of build | The build of a car can also influence the probability of injury and death. In current use, AV equipment seems to be used across a span of makes and models. |