Skip to main content

Table 3 The cost, quality-adjusted life years gained, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) from our microsimulation models (based on 10,000 microsumulations) for human piloted vehicles (HPVs) versus: privately-owned autonomous vehicles (AVs), AVs 5 years in the future, and AV taxis. The final simulation compares human piloted taxis versus AV taxiss

From: Autonomous vehicles are cost-effective when used as taxis

 

Cost

95% CI

QALYs

95% CI

ICER

  

2.50%

97.50%

 

2.50%

97.50%

 

Human-Piloted Vehicles Versus AVs

 HPVs

286,146

155,949

653,505

16.41

0.99

28.18

 

 AVs

425,757

288,479

594,010

16.51

1.47

28.34

1,396,110

 AVs in 5 Yearsa

303,535

173,959

613,182

16.51

1.47

28.34

173,890

 AV Taxis

447,667

306,002

634,870

16.51

1.47

28.34

1,615,210

Human-Piloted Taxis Versus AV Taxis

 HPT

570,032

222,787

1,205,646

16.41

0.99

28.18

 

 AV Taxis

447,667

306,002

634,870

16.51

1.47

28.34

Saves money and QALYs

  1. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in this analysis are only useful insofar as they inform consumers of the value of an AV relative to a conventional car on the grounds of the best available health data. These data are subject to considerable uncertainty
  2. aAVs were assumed to fall in price according to Moore’s Law, but were not assigned increased effectiveness