Skip to main content

Table 2 Measures of self-efficacy, attitude/beliefs and knowledge of FIP in control and intervention groups prior to receiving educational intervention*

From: An educational intervention for medical students to improve self-efficacy in firearm injury prevention counseling

Ā 

All

(nā€‰=ā€‰127)

Control

(nā€‰=ā€‰52)

Intervention

(nā€‰=ā€‰75)

p-value

1. I feel ready to counsel patients about firearm injury prevention

0.984

ā€ƒMean (SD)

2.9 (1.1)

2.9 (1.1)

2.9 (1.1)

2. I am confident I can provide appropriate advice and resources to patients about firearm safety

0.360

ā€ƒMean (SD)

2.7 (0.9)

2.6 (0.8)

2.7 (0.9)

3. There is not enough time in a doctor visit to talk about injury risk and prevention with a patient

0.885

ā€ƒMean (SD)

3.1 (1.1)

3.0 (1.1)

3.1 (1.0)

4. Asking patients about firearms is a violation of privacy and can damage the patient-doctor relationship

0.474

ā€ƒMean (SD)

1.8 (0.7)

1.8 (0.8)

1.8 (0.7)

5. Physicians should be trained to provide firearm safety counseling

0.778

ā€ƒMean (SD)

3.8 (0.8)

3.8 (0.9)

3.9 (0.7)

6. Gun violence should be considered a public health issue

0.235

ā€ƒMean (SD)

4.4 (0.8)

4.5 (0.8)

4.4 (0.7)

7. It is the physicianā€™s role to counsel and advise about firearm safety and prevention

0.277

ā€ƒMean (SD)

3.6 (0.9)

3.5 (0.8)

3.7 (0.9)

8. Number of correct quiz responses

0.842

ā€ƒMean (SD)

3.0 (1.2)

2.9 (1.2)

3.0 (1.2)

  1. *Questions 1ā€“2ā€‰=ā€‰self-efficacy, 3ā€“7ā€‰=ā€‰attitudes/beliefs, 8ā€‰=ā€‰knowledge
  2. **All responses were scored using a 5-point Likert scale (1ā€‰=ā€‰strongly disagree, 5ā€‰=ā€‰strongly agree)