Use of multiple failure models in injury epidemiology: a case study of arrest and intimate partner violence recidivism in Seattle, WA

Table 2 Time to recurrent IPV events comparing those arrested and not arrested in Seattle, WA from 1999 to 2001

First IPV Event /Total Recurrent IPV Events		Time-to-First IPV recurrence			Time-to-Multiple IPV recurrence GAP TIME
Arrested (n = 2901)	Not arrested (n = 2565)	Crude HR (95% CI)	Adjusted HR^a (95% CI)	Crude HR (95% CI)	Adjusted HR^a (95% CI)
Physical IPV
130 / 178	130 / 189	0.92 (0.72–1.18)	0.74 (0.57–0.97)	0.78 (0.65–0.95)	0.79 (0.64–0.97)
Psychological IPV
221 / 410	226 / 508	0.88 (0.73–1.07)	1.05 (0.84–1.30)	0.74 (0.65–0.85)	0.98 (0.84–1.14)

Note: CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio
^aAdjusted for index IPV abuse type, cohabitation, weapon use, police reported survivor injury at the index incident as well as police recorded perpetrator and survivor race

ISSN: 2197-1714