Table 2 Department-level Pearson correlation coefficient matrix (n = 112)
From: Size matters: How safety climate and downstream outcomes vary by fire department organization type
Percent EMS runs | Percent fire runs | Injury rate | Annual call volume | Roster size | Population served | Burnout on EMS runs | Engagement on EMS runs | Burnout on fire runs | Engagement on fire runs | Job satisfaction | Safety compliance | MC | SS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent EMS runs | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
Percent fire runs | − 0.87 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
Injury rate | 0.25 | − 0.26 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
Annual call volume | 0.17 | − 0.13 | 0.37 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
Roster size | 0.13 | − 0.11 | 0.31 | 0.97 | 1.00 | |||||||||
Population served | 0.16 | − 0.13 | 0.38 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.00 | ||||||||
Burnout on EMS runs | − 0.29 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 1.00 | |||||||
Engagement on EMS runs | 0.15 | − 0.04 | − 0.21 | − 0.05 | − 0.04 | − 0.04 | − 0.70 | 1.00 | ||||||
Burnout on fire runs | − 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.75 | − 0.44 | 1.00 | |||||
Engagement on fire runs | 0.14 | − 0.12 | − 0.11 | − 0.02 | − 0.01 | − 0.02 | − 0.43 | 0.51 | − 0.65 | 1.00 | ||||
Job satisfaction | − 0.10 | 0.19 | − 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | − 0.44 | 0.46 | − 0.45 | 0.42 | 1.00 | |||
Safety compliance | 0.17 | − 0.18 | − 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | − 0.44 | 0.28 | − 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 1.00 | ||
Management Commitment to safety (MC) | − 0.16 | 0.25 | − 0.32 | − 0.17 | − 0.15 | − 0.17 | − 0.41 | 0.37 | − 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.78 | 0.37 | 1.00 | |
Supervisor Support for safety (SS) | − 0.06 | 0.14 | − 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.06 | − 0.39 | 0.41 | − 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 1.00 |