Skip to main content

Prevalence of long gun use in Maryland firearm suicides

Abstract

Background

Firearms account for the majority of US suicides, largely due to lethality and accessibility. Under Federal and Maryland law, long guns are less regulated than handguns which is a concern for increased suicide risk. This study uses Maryland data to ascertain the impact of long guns on suicides in the state. We hypothesize that the prevalence of long gun use among firearm suicides will be increased in rural and young populations.

Methods

This is a cross sectional study using police and medical examiner narratives to identify firearm type involved in all 3931 Maryland gun suicides from 2003 to 2018. Proportions of firearm suicides utilizing long guns were calculated. Urban-rural differences were determined using the National Center for Health Statistics’ classification system. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios of long gun to handgun suicides across the urban-rural spectrum, controlling for decedent demographics.

Results

From 2003 to 2018, 28.4% of Maryland gun suicides used long guns. The proportion of long guns used was highest in the most rural counties, where 51.6% of firearm suicides were by long gun, compared to 16.8% in the most urban counties. Long guns were disproportionately used by the young. For decedents 18 or younger, 44.6% used long guns, compared to 20.2% in those 65 or older. Compared to the most urban counties, firearm suicide decedents in the most rural counties were 3.74x more likely to use long guns (OR = 3.74; 95% CI 2.19, 6.40; p < .001) after adjusting for demographics, intoxication, and hunting season.

Conclusions

Long guns are used in a large proportion of Maryland firearm suicides, particularly in rural areas and disproportionately in youth suicides. Long guns must be considered as part of access to lethal means or policy strategies in efforts to reduce the burden of firearm suicide.

Background

In the United States in 2017, there were more than 47,000 suicides (Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2019). While firearms are used in a small proportion of overall attempts, they account for more than half of fatal suicides, due in large part to a case fatality rate of more than 80% (Spicer and Miller 2000; Vyrostek et al. 2004; Conner et al. 2019). A significant proportion of suicide attempts are made impulsively, with the decision to act occurring within an hour of the attempt in 71% of cases, and within less than 5 min in 24% of cases (Deisenhammer et al. 2009; Simon et al. 2001). Given this short time between decision and action, it is unsurprising that the method used reflects method availability (Eddleston et al. 2006; Peterson et al. 1985), and if that method has a high lethality it will by definition result in higher mortality. Coupled with the fact that attempt survivors rarely die in subsequent attempts (O’Donnell et al. 1994; Seiden 1978), and most suicide decedents have no history of a past attempt (Cavanagh et al. 2003), access to highly lethal means has been recognized as one of the most important contributors to high rates of completed suicide.

Multiple studies have established a consistent association between household firearm ownership and increased suicide rates (Anglemyer et al. 2014; Butterworth et al. 2018; Shenassa et al. 2004; Kposowa et al. 2016; Dahlberg et al. 2004; Wiebe 2003). State laws that have reduced access by high risk individuals such as mandating background checks through purchaser licensing, waiting periods, and child access protection laws have all been found to reduce suicide rates individually and measured together (Anestis and Anestis 2015; Crifasi et al. 2015; Kaufman et al. 2018; Loftin et al. 1991; Webster et al. 2004).

Almost 80% of firearm homicides and 90% of nonfatal firearm injuries are committed with a handgun (Planty and Truman 2013), and this may guide the stricter regulations on handguns in comparison to long guns both federally and across states (Cook et al. 2011). While the majority of firearm deaths are self-inflicted, there has been limited research on the type of firearm used in suicides. A recent study using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) data for 13 states found that 27% of firearm suicides from 2005 to 2015 utilized a long gun, with greater proportions found in rural populations and young decedents (Centers for disease control and preventio 2019; Hanlon et al. 2019). Given the heterogeneity of states, there is a need for similar state-level investigations to describe this burden and assist in determining the need for interventions such as policy, education, screening, and safe storage initiatives aimed at reducing firearm suicide. This study examines the role of long guns in firearm mortality, particularly suicides, in a state which is currently grappling with the question of long gun regulation.

In Maryland, long gun ownership is less regulated than handgun ownership, especially in regard to age limits. In Maryland, it is prohibited for any person (licensed dealer or private individual) to sell or transfer a handgun to anyone under 21 and anyone under 21 is prohibited from possessing a handgun, yet there is no minimum age for possessing a rifle or shotgun (Md. Code Ann., Pub Safety § 5–134 n.d.). State regulations requiring waiting periods, permits to purchase and carry, and licensing of owners for handguns do not apply to long guns (Md. Code Ann., Pub Safety § 5-101(r)). These long gun exceptions in Maryland may increase the accessibility of long guns, especially to young people.

The increased accessibility of long guns has the potential to disproportionately impact rural areas where suicide rates are consistently higher than in urban counties, and the gap has increased dramatically over the past 10 years (Kegler et al. 2017). A recent study comparing urban to rural suicides in Maryland found that the increased rural rates were driven by firearm use (Nestadt et al. 2017). In general, rural decedents are more likely to use a firearm compared to urban decedents (Branas et al. 2004; Searles et al. 2014), and in a survey of rural firearm owners approximately 90% of households contained a long gun (Nordstrom et al. 2001). Data on long gun suicides may help inform public health initiatives and educational outreach to address the disproportionate impact on rural and young populations.

Federal restrictions on the collection and analysis of firearm data has resulted in a lack of detailed data on firearm ownership by region and demographics, as well as on the models of firearm used in suicide (Rostron 2018). However, individual police reports and medical examiner death scene investigations do generally document firearm types and can be accessed at the state and local level.

The current research examines the role of rifle and shotgun suicides in Maryland, with a focus on rurality and hunting season as potentially affecting risk. We hypothesize that long guns play a significant role in Maryland’s firearm deaths and in particular suicides. We further hypothesize that rurality, as well as other demographic and clinical factors, will affect long gun use among firearm suicide decedents. Secondarily, we will test an association between hunting season and long gun use for suicide and investigate whether these associations differ between the two types of long guns: rifles and shotguns.

Methods

Population and procedures

The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of Maryland (OCME) investigates all violent, sudden, suspicious, or unexpected deaths, as well as any death without a physician in attendance, and deaths in a penal institution in the state of Maryland. Maryland established the country’s first state-wide protocolized medical examiner system, which guarantees consistency in investigation throughout the state, unlike other data sets which use a heterogeneous mix of coroner and medical examiner systems with different standards for classification of suicide, varying levels of investigative depth, and inconsistent reporting standards. There have been no significant changes in medical examiner investigative or recording procedures since 2002 and OCME leadership has been consistent during the study period.

Our study is a cross sectional study using a complete listing for all 3994 non-homicide firearm deaths in Maryland from 2003 to 2018, including 3931 suicides, 29 unintentional deaths, and 34 deaths of undetermined manner. As described in previous publications (Nestadt et al. 2017), a board-certified psychiatrist (PSN) reviewed 5% of these cases via police and OCME reports, and then interviewed the chief medical examiner to confirm agreement with the OCME definitions of suicide. From the OCME records, we extracted age, sex, race/ethnicity (as defined by the OCME), county of residence, method of suicide, toxicology, and both OCME and police reports on the deaths.

Measures

Firearm type

Using police narratives, we coded the type of firearm used for each firearm death in the sample into either handgun or long gun (rifle or shotgun), based on the police report’s documenting of the weapon as handgun, shotgun, or rifle or in some cases by the specific model of weapon, which would be categorized accordingly. Among the 3994 deaths described in the dataset, there were 46 incidents noted for disagreements between police and medical investigation reports as to whether the long gun used was specifically a rifle or a shotgun. In these cases, which represented 1% of the total, PSN and KM performed manual reviews of the case reports to clarify the weapon type. The added detail in the narratives of the report usually made it clear which reporter was correct based on a specific model listed, which could be researched in the firearm maker’s catalogue and classified as rifle or shotgun by manufacturer description. In all cases, they agreed on the ultimate determination. Of these, 22 were reclassified as rifles and 22 shotguns, with 1 case where the weapon was found to be a handgun and 1 case where the technical cause of death was in fact hanging.

Demographics

We collected the sex, age, and race for each decedent from the OCME reports. To examine urban-rural differences, we used the county of residence for each decedent, categorized using the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. This scheme designates counties into 6 different classifications on the basis of population size and adjacency to metropolitan areas, with the lowest category number indicating the highest degree of urbanicity. The first 4 categories – Large Central Metro, Large Fringe Metro, Medium Metro, and Small Metro – fall under the metropolitan level and the last two categories – Micropolitan and Noncore – are considered nonmetropolitan. For directly comparing urban versus rural differences in firearm suicides, we collapsed the first 4 categories into one single urban category and the remaining two categories into one rural category, in accordance with their characterization in the NCHS.

Intoxication

Blood alcohol content (BAC) was recorded by the OCME from peripheral blood when the body was recovered quickly and estimated from aqueous humor when peripheral blood was not available before significant body decomposition. A decedent was considered to have been intoxicated on alcohol when the BAC collected in this manner was greater than .08%. Sex was determined by the medical examiner based on the physical exam at autopsy. Age was categorized into 5 bins, representative of youth (< 18 years), young adult (18–24), adult (25–44), middle age (45–64), and older (65 and older), to match categories used in previous studies of firearm type in suicide (Hanlon et al. 2019).

Hunting season

Hunting season was operationalized based on the Maryland Deer Hunting report (Eyler and Timko 2018), which tabulates that the majority of the firearm involved deer harvest was reported to occur in the 2 week season beginning on the Saturday after Thanksgiving, which moves year to year. Therefore, we operationalized hunting season throughout the study period as a binary variable positive for deaths in annual weeks 49 and 50, which approximates this time period over the years of the study.

We did not use the availability of mental health providers as a covariate in our analyses because a previous study using data from the OCME during the same time period found that there were no significant differences in mental health care provider availability across urban–rural counties of Maryland (Nestadt et al. 2017).

Analytic plan

Proportions of firearm suicides using long guns were calculated separately for each decedent characteristic. Odds ratios were calculated for each characteristic using single variable logistic regression. Proportions of long gun suicides for urban and rural demographics were computed using the NCHS categories explained above and age was categorized into the previously described five age ranges (< 18, 18–24, 25–44, 45–64, and > 65), with logistic regressions performed using the most urban and youngest categories respectively as references.

The proportion of long gun suicides among all firearm suicides were then calculated for each age range, stratifying by rurality, with NCHS categories 1–4 considered urban and 5–6 considered rural. In order to assess for an interaction between rural status and age category in predicting long gun use, an interaction term was created and tested in a logistic regression model.

Proportions of firearm suicide decedents who had used rifles or shotguns were separately tabulated, with χ2 tests performed to establish differences by decedent characteristics within each firearm type group.

To further evaluate the hypothesis that rurality may predict long gun use, a series of logistic regression models were tested, first adding adjustments for sex, race, and age (Model 2) because these are known to influence suicide rate and have been hypothesized to also correlate with long gun ownership. A third model was then tested with adjustments for alcohol intoxication and hunting season death (Model 3), as these were found to be associated with suicide rates in unadjusted analyses. We conducted all analyses with Stata version 16.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

Results

Our data query returned 3994 charts. The vast majority of firearm suicide decedents (82%) were non-Hispanic whites, with the remaining 18% distributed among several race and ethnicity categories, and so for the purposes of this study, decedents were categorized as either white or non-white. Race and/or age data was missing from only 10 cases. As the combined number of decedents missing either of these variables added up to less than 1% of the cohort, we continued analysis after listwise deletion of cases with these missing data. Toxicology was unavailable for 253 (6.4%) of the suicide decedents, usually due to the body not being recovered in time for accurate toxicology to be performed, and so these cases were dropped from any analysis which included BAC. In 101 cases (2.5%) the decedent county of residence was not in Maryland, and in 127 cases (3.2%) the county of residence was unknown. These cases were dropped from any analysis that took rurality into account.

Of all 3994 non-homicide firearm deaths studied, 1134 (28.4%) were caused by long guns. Among these, there were 29 unintentional firearm deaths, 6 (20.7%) were due to long guns including 3 shotguns and 3 rifles. There were 34 firearm deaths of undetermined manner, 12 (35.3%) were by long gun including 10 shotguns and 2 rifles. The remaining non-homicide firearm deaths were suicides. Of the 3931 firearm suicides 1116 (28.4%) used long guns. Of these, 786 (70.4%) were via shotgun and the remaining 330 (29.6%) via rifle (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Although the proportion of firearm deaths by long gun were calculated for each manner of death, only suicide deaths included a sufficiently large sample for the remainder of the analysis described below.

A breakdown of type of firearm used by decedent characteristics is presented in Table 1. Among these firearm suicides, long gun use was more prevalent in men than women (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.81, 3.16; p < .001) and more common in whites than non-whites (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.83, 2.79; p < .001).

Table 1 Characteristics of Maryland Firearm Suicides 2003–2018, with Unadjusted Odds Ratios

Increasing rurality as well as younger age were both strongly associated with increasing proportions of long gun use, in a graded fashion. Compared to the most urban decedents, the most rural decedents were more than 5x as likely to have used a long gun (OR = 5.3; 95% CI = 3.17, 8.79; p < .001), with each level of rurality associated with increasing likelihood. Significant age differences were also found, with decedents younger than 18 years demonstrating the highest proportion (44.6%) of long gun use, compared to much lower rates (20.2%) in those 65 or older (OR = .31; 95% CI = .20, .50; p < .001). During deer hunting season in Maryland, firearm suicide decedents were no more likely to have used a long gun.

Rifles and shotguns were then evaluated separately, and hunting season was found to correlate with a higher proportion of rifle use among firearm suicides, χ2(1, N = 3931) = 4.15, p = .042). There was a nonsignificant decrease in shotgun use for suicide during hunting season. The established increased use of long guns in whites, males, and youth was found to be more pronounced in rifle than shotgun use, as shown in Table 2. However, the primary finding of increasing long gun use with increasing rurality was much more pronounced in shotguns, though still strong in rifles. Shotgun users were also significantly less likely to be intoxicated at the time of their suicide.

Table 2 Characteristics of Rifle and Shotgun Use Among Firearm Suicides

The proportion of long gun suicides by age group stratified by urban and rural categories is shown in Fig. 1. Within both categories of rurality, the proportion of long gun suicides decreased with age, while remaining disproportionately rural in each age group. Among rural firearm suicide decedents under 18, 4 out of 5 decedents (80%) had used a long gun, while only 43% of their urban counterparts had done so. This trend was repeated within every age category, though the differences became less stark with increasing age. In logistic regression, an interaction between rural status and age category was found to be significant (OR = .68; 95% CI = .49, .96; p = .030), indicating that the increasing proportions of long gun use with younger age were more dramatic in rural populations than urban.

Fig. 1
figure1

Proportion of Firearm Suicides Involving Long Guns, by Age and Rurality. NCHS categories 1–4 are considered urban and categories 5–6 are rural

The relationship between rurality and long gun use was further tested using a series of sequentially adjusted regression models, displayed in Table 3. Model 1 illustrates the relationship between the categories of rurality and the use of a long gun to be quite robust in unadjusted analysis, with the most rural counties demonstrating 5.3 times the proportion of long gun suicides compared to the most urban counties, as well as a linear increase in long gun use across the urban-rural spectrum. In Model 2, adjustments were made for age, sex and race which had demonstrated significance in distinguishing long gun use from handgun use in firearm suicides. Adjusting for age, sex, and race did not negate the correlation with rurality. A final model, Model 3, added adjustmentsfor alcohol intoxication and hunting season, as these had been hypothesized to contribute to the availability and hazard for long gun use in suicide, though did not demonstrate the larger associations with long gun use for suicide seen in univariate analysis of age, sex and race. Although this adjustment diminished the finding, with the odds ratio comparing the most rural to most urban decedents dropping to 3.7, the finding remained significant across all NCHS categories in this and all other models.

Table 3 Stepwise Logistic Regression Analysis with Odds for Predictors of Long Gun Use Among Firearm Suicides

Discussion

Our findings reveal that in Marylandlong guns are responsible for a substantial proportion of non-homicide firearm deaths. Among firearm related deaths by unintentional or undetermined manner, which are much less common than suicides, 28.6% were caused by long guns, primarily shotguns. Although the sample of non-suicide firearm death was limited to 63 cases, to our knowledge this was the first study to investigate firearm type in these deaths.

We found that 28.4% of firearm suicides used long guns, with 70.4% of these being shotguns. This proportion of long gun suicides was consistent with Hanlon et al.’s (2019) previous study using national data across all age groups which found that 27% of firearm suicides used long guns. These findings were also similar to a small study of Sacramento County, which found that 31% of firearm suicides were by long gun, though they noted that rifles were twice as commonly used as shotguns in that sample. This may reflect increased prevalence of rifles over shotguns in that region, as that study included survey data from the Pacific census division reporting 40% of self-reported firearms were rifles and only 26% shotguns (Wintemute et al. 1998). National surveys conducted by the Pew Research Center also found that while 62% of firearm owners reported that they owned a rifle, only 54% owned a shotgun (Parker et al. 2017). Maryland’s proportion of rifle and shotgun ownership is not known, but future studies may develop local surveys for this purpose and address this unresolved question while exploring alternate reasons for the increased proportions of shotgun suicides.

Consistent with an earlier national study (Hanlon et al. 2019), the present study found that the use of a long gun for suicide was more common in whites and men, and that long guns demonstrated increasing use with increasing rurality and decreasing age. We also found that for rifles, which are the most common weapon used for hunting, the proportion of suicides increased dramatically during deer hunting season. This did not hold true for other firearm types. Previous studies have found that alcohol intoxication is associated with the choice of more violent and lethal suicide methods—hanging and firearm use as compared to overdose or other poisonings—and that this association is strongest in younger decedents (Conner et al. 2014). We considered that this may also apply to the use of long guns, which may be seen as more lethal than smaller weapons, and did find this to be the case with intoxicated decedents choosing to use a long gun 21% more often than sober decedents.

Research has consistently shown that the accessibility of a particular method is the primary determinant of its use in suicide (Anglemyer et al. 2014; Butterworth et al. 2018; Kposowa et al. 2016; Spicer and Miller 2000; Vyrostek et al. 2004). While the relative ownership of long guns to handguns in Maryland is not known, we do know that the most common reported purpose for having a long gun is hunting (Wolfson et al. 2018). Rural residents are more likely to hunt, and over 90% of hunters are white and/or male (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018; Wilson et al. 2012). These demographics may explain the disproportionate long gun use in rural areas. Interestingly, the increase in long gun use over successively more rural counties remained strongly significant even after adjusting for demographics, alcohol intoxication, and hunting season deaths.

In addition to rurality, the use of a long gun increased with decreasing age, with 45% of decedents under 18 using long guns compared to 28% of decedents 18 and over. As shown in Table 3, this correlation with age did not dissipate when controlling for other characteristics. Suicides are often impulsive, especially in the young (Deisenhammer et al. 2009; Simon et al. 2001), and younger people have been shown to have greater increases in suicide rates when exposed to a firearm in the home than those 18 and over (Miller et al. 2015). The increased odds of suicide by long gun may reflect long guns being harder to hide and more expensive to lock away from children. As shown in Fig. 1, 80% of rural youth firearm suicides were by long gun and there is a steeper age-based correlation in rural counties, where the young may be more likely to have access to weapons for hunting purposes. The significance of the interaction between rural status and age group may reflect the popularity of hunting using rifles and shotguns among young people, more commonly in rural than urban areas.

Another potential explanation for the use of long guns by younger decedents may be the lack of legal restrictions on their owning these weapons or purchasing them in private sales. Aside from those who may already have a firearm in the home, the ability to immediately purchase long guns at a young age, without background check or waiting period, makes them more accessible to that demographic than handguns.

Future studies should investigate how changes in regulatory policies, such as child access protection laws, licensing, and age limits which bring long gun requirements in line with those of handguns may help to reduce youth suicide rates. These findings provide a detailed breakdown of the demographic-specific dangers of rifles and shotguns, but future studies might look into the ways in which long guns were accessed leading to a suicide, including whether they tend to be purchased soon before use, or if they are long owned or even family heirlooms. Patterns of safe storage should be investigated, as long guns may lend themselves to different forms of storage or be more likely to be on display, and hence accessible to those at risk.

While firearm suicide may be best seen through a public health lens with policy-level solutions (McLean et al. 2019), this work also provides valuable insights for the clinician focused on suicide prevention on a patient-by-patient basis. While universal screening for suicidal ideation may have a limited impact on completed suicides (Nestadt et al. 2018), discussing with patients about their access to firearms and counseling them on reducing access and safe storage of firearms is an effective and evidence based practice (Yip et al. 2012), included in national guidelines (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2012), though unfortunately underutilized (Betz et al. 2018; Roszko et al. 2016). In rural communities, where hunting is common and exposure more frequent, long guns may not be considered especially dangerous compared to handguns and so may not be considered when clinicians ask about firearms in the home. In much the same way that clinicians must specify over the counter medicines and supplements when taking a medication history, long gun access should be queried directly in a complete assessment. This is particularly the case in rural populations and for the highest risk patients, such as white men. Young patients and their parents should be reminded of the importance of safe storage and the removal of firearms during a crisis. New tools may be utilized to encourage safe storage at the point of care, taking firearm type into account (Betz et al. 2019).

Hunters may be at increased risk and interventions which focus on this population may include safe storage pamphlets and suicide crisis resource brochures at hunting stores and firing ranges, as well as in materials distributed in hunting forums and media. This underscores the importance of local partnerships with groups like the Gun Shop Project, which leverages the concern of firearm owners and others in the firearm industry to disseminate information on firearm safety and suicide risk directly to retailers and hunting supply shops (Henn et al. 2019). These firearm-owner led outreach and education groups have been effective in reaching rural gun owners and reducing firearm suicides, and equivalents have already gained traction in Maryland (Barber et al. 2017). While legislatively reducing access to firearms is less feasible, this data may be helpful in the ongoing efforts to promote safe storage practices, which may be spearheaded by hunting supply retailers themselves (Pierpoint et al. 2019; Tung et al. 2019). When trusted retailers are made aware of the increased use of long guns in suicides in the rural areas they serve, as well as the increase in rifle use for suicide during hunting season, they may be more likely to pass on these warnings to at risk customers and families.

Strengths and limitations

There were several strengths to this study that support the validity and importance of the findings. The use of primary data from the state medical examiner for the purpose of detailing and confirming firearm type is unprecedented, as far as we are aware. These data are more current, more complete, and more consistently collected than national data sources derived from a mixture of coroner and medical examiner systems (Blair et al. 2016; Hanzlick 2006). A single state focus allowed a consistent hunting season variable to be defined and investigated, as hunting season does vary from region to region in the US, depending in part on the popular game. Maryland is an opportune study setting, not only because of the completeness of data afforded by a statewide medical examiner system, but for its wide range of rurality across counties ranging from the very urban Baltimore to swathes of rural western Maryland and the Eastern shore.

There are several limitations to this study. Choosing to focus on one state came with a cost to sample size. However, despite the lower power, the results maintained significance even when adjusted for important covariates. Another limitation of a single state study may be limited generalizability. Results found in Maryland may not apply to other states, such as those with extremes of rurality or different racial makeups. Finally, although no legislation specifically impacting long guns passed during the study period, changes in legislation during the study period were not controlled for, and may have affected the death by firearm rates.

Conclusions

These findings draw attention to the role of long guns in contributing to firearm suicides, which are disproportionately used in rural and youth suicides. These findings highlight the need for more research to determine why youth are more likely to use long guns, and whether this is due to increased access due to lower age limits and more cultural acceptance of child possession of long guns. This research also has important implications for the need to educate communities, public health practitioners, law enforcement, and other key stakeholders about the important role firearm access plays in suicide prevention, particularly among rural youth. Addressing access to lethal means and increasing targeted screening should also be part of a concerted effort to prevent death and injury. Long guns are an important factor that should not be ignored by policy makers or clinicians as they work to reduce the burden of firearm death in the US.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of Maryland but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of Maryland.

Abbreviations

BAC:

Blood alcohol content

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

NCHS:

National Center for Health Statistics

NVDRS:

National Violent Death Reporting System

OCME:

Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of Maryland

References

  1. Anestis MD, Anestis JC. Suicide rates and state laws regulating access and exposure to handguns. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(10):2049–58. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302753.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Anglemyer A, Horvath T, Rutherford G. The accessibility of firearms and risk for suicide and homicide victimization among household members: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(2):101 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24592495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber C, Frank E, Demicco R. Reducing suicides through partnerships between health professionals and gun owner groups—beyond docs vs glocks. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(1):5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Betz ME, Kautzman M, Segal DL, Miller I, Camargo J, Carlos A, Boudreaux ED, et al. Frequency of lethal means assessment among emergency department patients with a positive suicide risk screen. Psychiatry Res. 2018;260:30–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Betz ME, Knoepke CE, Siry B, Clement A, Azrael D, Ernestus S, Matlock DD. ‘Lock to live’: development of a firearm storage decision aid to enhance lethal means counselling and prevent suicide. Injury Prev. 2019;25(Suppl 1):i18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blair JM, Fowler KA, Jack SPD, Crosby AE. The national violent death reporting system: overview and future directions. Injury Prev. 2016;22(Suppl 1):i6–i11. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Branas CC, Nance ML, Elliott MR, Richmond TS, Schwab CW. Urban-rural shifts in intentional firearm death: different causes, same results. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1750–5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.10.1750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Butterworth SE, Daruwala SE, Anestis MD. Firearm storage and shooting experience: factors relevant to the practical capability for suicide. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;102:52–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavanagh JTO, Carson AJ, Sharpe M, Lawrie SM. Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2003;33(3):395–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006943.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for disease control and prevention. web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS). leading causes of death reports 1981–2017. 2019. https://www-cdc-gov.proxy1.library.jhu.edu/injury/wisqars/fatal.html. Accessed 30 Aug 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conner A, Azrael D, Miller M. Suicide Case-Fatality Rates in the United States, 2007 to 2014: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Ann Intern Med. 2019; [Epub ahead of print 3 December 2019]. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Conner KR, Huguet N, Caetano R, Giesbrecht N, McFarland BH, Nolte KB, et al. Acute use of alcohol and methods of suicide in a US national sample. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(1):171–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook PJ, Braga AA, Moore MH. Gun Control. In: Crime and public policy, revised edition, edited by James Q. Wilson and Joan Petersilia. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crifasi CK, Meyers JS, Vernick JS, Webster DW. Effects of changes in permit-to-purchase handgun laws in Connecticut and Missouri on suicide rates. Prev Med. 2015;79:43–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dahlberg LL, Ikeda RM, Kresnow M-j. Guns in the home and risk of a violent death in the home: findings from a national study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(10):929–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deisenhammer EA, Ing C, Strauss R, Kemmler G, Hinterhuber H, Weiss EM. The duration of the suicidal process: how much time is left for intervention between consideration and accomplishment of a suicide attempt? J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.07m03904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eddleston M, Karunaratne A, Weerakoon M, Kumarasinghe S, Rajapakshe M, Sheriff MH, Buckley NA, Gunnell D. Choice of poison for intentional self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(3):283–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eyler B, Timko G. Maryland annual deer report 2017–2018. Maryland: Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife and Heritage Service; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hanlon TJ, Barber C, Azrael D, Miller M. Type of firearm used in suicides: findings from 13 states in the national violent death reporting system, 2005–2015. J Adolesc Health. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.03.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanzlick R. Medical examiners, coroners, and public health: a review and update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130(9):1274–82 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16948511.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Henn M, Barber C, Hemenway D. Involving firearm stakeholders in community-based suicide prevention efforts. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2019;6(2):231–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaufman EJ, Morrison CN, Branas CC, Wiebe DJ. State firearm laws and interstate firearm deaths from homicide and suicide in the United States: a cross-sectional analysis of data by county. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(5):692–700. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0190.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kegler SR, Stone DM, Holland KM. Trends in suicide by level of urbanization — united states, 1999–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(10):270–3. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6610a2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kposowa A, Hamilton D, Wang K. Impact of firearm availability and gun regulation on state suicide rates. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2016;46(6):678–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loftin C, McDowall D, Wiersema B, Cottey TJ. Effects of restrictive licensing of handguns on homicide and suicide in the District of Columbia. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(23):1615–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199112053252305.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McLean RM, Harris P, Cullen J, Maier R, Yasuda KE, Schwartz BJ, et al. Firearm-related injury and death in the United States: a call to action from the nation’s leading physician and public health professional organizations. Ann Intern Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-2441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller M, Warren M, Hemenway D, Azrael D. Firearms and suicide in US cities. Injury Prevention. 2015;21(e1):e116–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nestadt PS, Triplett P, Fowler DR, Mojtabai R. Urban-rural differences in suicide in the state of maryland: The role of firearms. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(10):1548–53. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nestadt PS, Triplett P, Mojtabai R, Berman AL. Universal screening may not prevent suicide. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.06.006.

  30. Nordstrom DL, Zwerling C, Stromquist AM, Burmeister LF, Merchant JA. Rural population survey of behavioral and demographic risk factors for loaded firearms. Injury Prev. 2001;7(2):112–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.7.2.112.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Donnell I, Arthur AJ, Farmer RDJ. A follow-up study of attempted railway suicides. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(3):437–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90444-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Parker, K., Horowitz, J. M., Igielnik, R., Oliphant, B., & Brown, A. America’s complex relationship with guns. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. 2017.

  33. Peterson L, Peterson M, O’Shanick G, Swann A. Self-inflicted gunshot wounds: Lethality of method versus intent. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;142:228–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pierpoint LA, Tung GJ, Brooks-Russell A, Brandspigel S, Betz M, Runyan CW. Gun retailers as storage partners for suicide prevention: what barriers need to be overcome? Injury Prev. 2019;25(Suppl 1):i5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Planty M, Truman JL. Firearm violence, 1993–2011. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rostron A. The dickey amendment on federal funding for research on gun violence: A legal dissection. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(7):865–7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304450.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Roszko PJD, Ameli J, Carter PM, Cunningham RM, Ranney ML. Clinician attitudes, screening practices, and interventions to reduce firearm-related injury. Epidemiol Rev. 2016;38(1):87–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxv005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Searles VB, Valley MA, Hedegaard H, Betz ME. Suicides in urban and rural counties in the united states, 2006–2008. Crisis. 2014;35(1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seiden RH. Where are they now? A follow-up study of suicide attempters from the golden gate bridge. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1978;8(4):203–16 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/217131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shenassa ED, Rogers ML, Spalding KL, Roberts MB. Safer storage of firearms at home and risk of suicide: a study of protective factors in a nationally representative sample. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(10):841–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.017343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Simon OR, Swann AC, Powell KE, Potter LB, Kresnow MJ, O’Carroll PW. Characteristics of impulsive suicide attempts and attempters. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2001;32(1 Suppl):49–59 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11924695.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Spicer RS, Miller TR. Suicide acts in 8 states: Incidence and case fatality rates by demographics and method. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(12):1885–91. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.90.12.1885.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tung GJ, Pierpoint LA, Betz ME, Brooks-Russell A, Brandspigel S, Runyan CW. Gun Retailers’ Willingness to Provide Gun Storage for Suicide Prevention. Am J Health Behav. 2019;43(1):15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. U.S. department of health and human services, office of the surgeon general and national action alliance for suicide prevention. 2012 national strategy for suicide prevention: Goals and objectives for action. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  45. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. 2018 https://wsfrprograms.fws.gov/subpages/nationalsurvey/nat_survey2016.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vyrostek S, Annest J, Ryan G. Surveillance for fatal and nonfatal injuries — united states, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(SS-7):1–57 https://www.jstor.org/stable/42568175.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Webster DW, Vernick JS, Zeoli AM, Manganello JA. Association between youth-focused firearm laws and youth suicides. JAMA. 2004;292(5):594–601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.5.594.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wiebe DJ. Homicide and suicide risks associated with firearms in the home: A national case-control study. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(6):771–82. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2003.187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilson S, Plane D, Mackun P, Fischetti T, Goworowska J. Patterns of metropolitan and micropolitan population change: 2000–10. Decennial Census Special Rep. 2012;30:ASI 2326–31 census C2010SR-01. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wintemute GJ, Teret SP, Kraus JF, Wright MW. The choice of weapons in firearm suicides. Am J Public Health. 1998;78(7):824–6. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.7.824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wolfson JA, Azrael D, Miller M. Gun ownership among US women. Injury Prev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2018-042991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yip, P.S., Caine E, Yousuf S, Chang S, Wu KC & Chen Y. Means restriction for suicide prevention. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2393–2399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60521-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Dr. Nestadt is supported by the James Wah Fund for Mood Disorders.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DF investigated the cases analyzed in this study and provided the OCME reports from which the data in this study was extracted. PN and KM designed the initial study, conducted the analysis of the data, and drafted the manuscript. All authors were involved in the analytical plan and data interpretation. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul S. Nestadt.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study, using data on deceased subjects, was deemed exempt by the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Institutional Review Board (#17–11).

Consent for application

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nestadt, P.S., MacKrell, K., McCourt, A.D. et al. Prevalence of long gun use in Maryland firearm suicides. Inj. Epidemiol. 7, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0230-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Firearms
  • Suicide
  • Long guns
  • Policy
  • Rurality
  • Epidemiology